Without the internet I would not have found out what was happening to me on the level of gangstalking and on more involved levels.
But I try to remain reasonable and not go conspiracy nut...I also try to illustrate my points when I can and show proof.
There is so much great info on the web but alot of sites or pieces done by well meaning people, and maybe not so well meaning (disinfo agents) mix up thier research practices. Like there will be some of it that shows a link or reference to documentation to prove the info has a reference and then the same piece will have quotes from people in supposed printed articles but with no reference to prove they exist. Then there is alot of so and so said to so and so " blah blah blah" without any reference as to where this info was obtained from or a person used as reliable sources or testimony.
In order to get anyone to listen to us we have to act like we are already in a court room. Without a forensics lab unfortunately, to prove that any documents aren't fakes..nowadays this is very easy if you have the equipment for such deceptions. Especially if you are from the shadow world of covert warfare where I am sure that brilliant, creative minds came up with such things long ago before the public even heard about such capabilities.
So if you can leave references next to info and use words like 'alleged' next to here say my already tired mind would be appreciative. I want to beleive but its so easy for the naysayers to just write the official line and that squashes any doubt supposedly.
Besides I would be very curious to see the original sources of alot of info out there.
I know that alot of books came out on various subject matter before the internet...some of these had quite good credentials and ....you were allowed to write books like that back then.
When you are writing a piece just pretend that the enemy is right beside you..nay saying you already. Then when it comes out, they are already all done before it even hits them. What can they say?
Awww, the 'conspiracy theorists' wrote a piece with YOU in mind naysayer! And the anecdote is already in it before you can administer your poison.