This is why organized stalking and harassment work so well. Note how this page focuses heavily on the assumption that race is a focal point of all police abuse. This totally misses the major corruption going on within most police departments. The only truly useful statment is the one that notes that politics largely shapes the way the police function or sets a tone for the way corruption works. That is the only thing in this article to even get a person to start thinking along the lines of how it all really works.
The other info is really obvious.
The key to validating organized stalking and harassment is to begin THINKING along different lines. Its a whole other world when it comes to covert warfare and on can no longer use logic that is within a framework that is the norm.
This is the way that the system denies gang stalkings existence or that targeted individuals are delusional people making unrealistic claims.
My campaign seems to have been fought with counter measures that were also covert. THE MAIN FOCUS OF ALL SIDES IS TO KEEP THE PUBLIC FROM UNDERSTANDING THE POWER STRUCTURES THAT ARE HIDDEN TO THEM WITHIN SOCIETY.
This area, where most people are in the dark about how corruption and politics really work is THE breeding ground or home of covert activities and warfare.
Also note how race is so focused on that gender escapes any focus. As well as now one can see the brilliance of using many people from different walks of life for harassment campaigns. The way that society presents 'problems' or corruption creates a perception in the public's mind of just exactly what corruption is and who its perps and victims are. Never addressing other scenerios popularizes only certain kinds of crimes or corruption scenerios so the public are not educated in other possible abuses of power and resources.
Then any presentation of such ideas or scenerios is then countered with such an idea being out of the bounds of reality or reason so as to seal the fate or destroy such scenerios being considered realistic.
Then using society's established framework to thier advantage the gs system applies harassment in such a way (along with a targets psych profile and history it is assumed obvious by many targets) as to create the illusion that the TI themselves is mentally il, racist, sexist etc.
The ACLU has been traditionally useless to targeted individuals even those with no compaint of suspected use of technologies in thier campaigns.
I often wonder if this is becuz in some lawbook somewhere its made obvious that such activities fall under an area that is protected by law and once the TI has been put into that situation there is no legal recourse, though to the laymen it would appear that they deserve all rights like normal citizens.
The only thing that comes close in this page is the mention of harassment or surveillance of activists.